Ranger 1: A Field Perspective on Bear Conservation in British Columbia (2025)
By: Ryan Brooks (Ranger 1)
Wildlife Monitor & Guide
~ Conservation Issues Regarding Bears in British Columbia (Revised & Expanded 2014-2019 & 2023-2025) ~
British Columbia is home to an estimated 25,000 black bears (Ursus americanus) and approximately 14,000 brown (grizzly) bears (Ursus arctos), representing one of the most significant bear populations in Canada. Due to their slow reproductive rates and sensitivity to environmental change, bears are widely recognized as keystone / Umbrella / Indicator species, reflecting the overall health and integrity of ecosystems across the province & nationwide.
Despite relatively stable population estimates, bears in British Columbia face escalating conservation challenges. Primary threats include habitat loss and fragmentation, declining or disrupted food sources and increasing conflict with humans, livestock and industry. Human bear conflict is most commonly driven by food conditioning and habituation, whereby bears lose their natural avoidance of people (or “loss of fear of man”) after repeated exposure and to unsecured attractants such as garbage, fruit trees, livestock feed, fish waste and human food sources.
~ Escalating Human / Bear Conflict and Lethal Outcomes (2023-2024) ~
Recent reporting highlights a sharp increase in lethal management response to human/bear conflict in British Columbia. In 2023, the B.C Conservation Officer Service (COS) destroyed a record 598 bears, up from 497 in 2022 and 484 in 2021, with approximately one in five COS calls resulting in a bear being killed or euthanized (Globe and Mail, 2024). Since 2011, B.C Conservation Officer Service has destroyed an estimated 4,300 black bears and 160 brown bears province wide (2019 Vic News; CBC News).
Urban centres have been disproportionately affected. News released data shows Prince George alone recorded 76 black bears killed in 2023, more than double previous annual averages. Between 2021 and 2023, a total of 339 bears were destroyed in the city, with provincial officials and wildlife experts attributing the majority of these deaths to poor attractant management rather than aggressive bear behaviour. (CBC News, 2024)
Media investigations and public commentary increasingly question whether lethal control has become the default response to conflict, rather than last resort. Conservation advocates argue that inconsistent policies, limited rehabilitation capacity, and insufficient investment in preventative measures contribute to unnecessary bear deaths, including the orphaning of dependent cubs (Globe and Mail, 2024; Global News, 2024).
~ Environmental Stressors and Climate Driven Conflict ~
Climate change has further intensified human bear conflict across British Columbia. Extreme heat events, prolonged drought, wildfires, and declining salmon returns have reduced the availability and reliability of natural food sources. As a result, bears are travelling farther and spending more time near human settlements in search of calories, increasing the likelihood of conflict *CBC News, 2021; CBC News, 2024)
Multiple reports link poor berry crops, salmon timing mismatches, habitat disruption from wildfire directly increase in bear encounters, particularly in late summer and fall when bears are hyperphagic and most vulnerable to food conditioning.
~ Defensive Bear Attacks and Public Perception ~
Although bear attacks on humans remain rare, several high profile defensive encounters in 2023-2025 including incidents involving dog walkers, forestry workers, tree planters, and residents in communities such as Maple fridge, Bella Coola, Sayward, and northern B.C have drawn significant media attention ( CBC News, CTV News; Global News).
In most cases, authorities identified the bears’ behaviour as defensive, often involving surprise encounters, cub protection, or the presence of dogs. Nevertheless, these incidents frequently resulted in bears being destroyed, reinforcing public concern that lethal outcomes are often applied even where bears are responding instinctively rather than exhibiting predatory behaviour.
~ Implications for Bear Conservation in British Columbia ~
Taken together, recent news and data reinforces a consistent conclusion: bear conservation challenges in British Columbia are driven primarily by human behaviour, land use decisions, and reactive management practices not by increasing bear aggression or overpopulation.
Effective long term conservation will depend on:
– Proactive attractant management and enforcement
– Investment in non-lethal conflict prevention (hazing)
– Expansion of Indigenous Guardian and Wildlife Monitoring programs (Ranger 1)
– Habitat protection and climate resilient land use planning
– Transparent reporting and accountability in conflict response decisions
Without these measures, bear mortality is likely to remain high despite stable population estimates and strong public support for coexistence.
~ Bear Conflict, Recreation, and Tourism ~
As British Columbia continues to attract more visitors to its rugged & wild landscapes, recreation and tourism are increasingly intersecting with wildlife, particularly with bears, in ways that contribute to human bear / conflict. Two major trends are driving this dynamic: expanded backcountry recreation and a changing management & evolving context for large carnivores.
~ Recreation & Backcountry Access ~
Modern outdoor recreation, ranging from multi-day hiking, trail running, backcountry camping, mountain biking, 4×4 excursions, heli-tourism, ski touring to wildlife viewing, has expanded significantly in recent decades. Improvements in infrastructure, social media promotion or remote experiences, and increased interest in nature based tourism have brought more people into core bear & wildlife habitat, often without corresponding increase in education, preparedness, or “boots on the ground” experience or stewardship support.
This expanding human footprint inside primary bear ranges increases the probability of surprise encounters, especially in areas where:
1. Bears are foraging near trails during hyperphagia (late summer/early fall)
2. Visibility is poor due to dense vegetation or terrain, and
3. People travel quietly (e.g., runners, solo hikers, wildlife photographers) without noise makers, bear deterrents or a professional guide – Wildlife Monitor / Land Guardian.
Even well intention backcountry users can unintentionally habituate bears by leaving behind attractants (food, scented gear), improperly stored food, or failing to follow bear aware protocols. The result is a mixing of human activity and bear ecology in high use areas, which statistically increases conflict risk.
~ Tourism & Commercial Wildlife Viewing ~
Commercial bear viewing, especially in regions with predictable wildlife aggregations (e.g salmon streams, estuaries) has become a significant tourism draw. While this creates economic incentives for conservation and local engagement with wildlife, it also requires sophisticated planning and safety management. When large numbers of visitors congregate in bear habitat without adequate professional oversight or risk management, the potential for negative encounters rises.
Without robust standards, guide training, and enforcement of best practices, wildlife viewing tourism can inadvertently:
-Condition bears to human presence,
-Displace wildlife from prime habitat,
-Increase stress in sensitive populations, and
-Shift public expectations toward habituated wildlife encounters.
~ Population Dynamics Post Grizzly Hunting Ban ~
British Columbia’s decision to end sport hunting for grizzly bears in 2017 was grounded in scientific and ethical arguments aimed at long term population stability, ecosystem integrity, and social values. As bear populations recover or stabilize under non-consumptive management, the baseline numbers of bears inhabiting multi-use landscapes increasing over time.
A corollary to this recovery process is that expanding bear populations, combined with the interaction frontier between people and bears. In essence:
Rewilding and population recovery are conservation successes,
but they change the spatial context in which humans and bears co-occur, which leads to a rising overlap between recreation/tourism areas and prime bear habitat.
This does not mean bears become learn to become “problem wildlife”; rather, the probability of human / bear encounters increase simply because both people and bears share the same landscape more frequently.
~ The Trend: Shared Spaces, Shared Risks ~
Across British Columbia and comparable jurisdictions, a pattern emerges:
1. Increased backcountry recreation tourism
2. Greater visitation of remote bear habitat
3. Recovery of large carnivore populations under non-lethal management
4. Higher encounter rates and conflict incidents
This trend has been documented between conflict as an inevitable overlap and conflict as a failure of management or preparedness. The former reflects broader socio-ecological shifts (more people, more bears, more shared space). The latter is where proactive interventions such as public outreach, wildlife monitoring, development of bear/wildlife awareness, and community stewardship can significantly reduce negative bear/human/wildlife outcomes.
~ Integrating Recreation into Coexistence Framework ~
To mitigate conflict in high use recreational and tourism landscape, effective strategies include:
-Mandatory bear awareness and risk mitigation education for backcountry users and commercial operators,
-Improved infrastructure (e.g,. Food storage human waste management, Wildlife Prevention Through Environmental Design – WPTED for trails and park use)
-On the ground Wildlife Monitors in hotspots during peak seasons,
-Permitting conditions tied best practices for tourism operators
-Data mapping and signage to inform users of recent bear and wildlife activity
-Collaborative planning between parks, First Nations, local governments, licensees and tourism stakeholders.
Taken together, a practice, integrated approach to recreation and wildlife management acknowledges both the ecological reality of thriving bear populations and the social reality of increasing human use of wild spaces. Rather than viewing bears and people as competing for space, this perspective emphasizes through preparation, adaption, and shared responsibility.
~ Grizzly Bear Incidents and Conservation Context: British Columbia, 2025 ~
In 2025, two widely reported grizzly bear incidents in British Columbia brought renewed attention to the challenges of managing human / wildlife interactions in an era of increasing recreation, tourism, industry, and conservation driven wildlife recovery.
In November 2025, a grizzly bear attacked a group of elementary school students and teachers near Bella Coola, British Columbia, resulting in injuries to eleven people. Media coverage emphasized the rarity of such attacks while noting that the incident occurred in a region with a long history of grizzly bear presence and regular human use of trails and adjacent forested areas (Canadian Press, 2025; The Guardian 2025). The event had a profound social impact on the community, leading to school closures, trauma support measures, and heightened public concern regarding safety in a shared landscape with bears.
Earlier in summer 2025, a separate incident occurred on Texada Island, where a grizzly bear, an unusual presence on the coastal island was shot and killed. Subsequent reporting indicated that charges were laid in relation to the bear’s death and that non-lethal response options, including relocation, had been under discussion prior to the killing (Winnipeg Free Press, 2025). This case highlighted challenges associated with rapid response, jurisdictional coordination, and public preparedness when large carnivores appear outside their typical range.
Together, these incidents illustrate two distinct related conservation challenges: rare but high impact defensive encounters in areas of human use, and premature lethal outcomes driven by uncertainty, fear, or limited preventative capacity. Importantly, neither case suggests a broader increase in aggressive bear behaviour. Instead, both reflect growing spatial overlap between people and bears, combined with gaps in early intervention and on the ground stewardship, helping to reduce the likelihood that encounters escalate into injuries or lethal outcomes.
~ Preventative Considerations ~
The 2025 incidents reinforce the need to move beyond reactive responses toward prevention focused conservation strategies. Expanding the use of Wildlife Monitors and Indigenous Land Guardians provide a practical and viable solution by establishing consistent, boots on the ground presence in areas where human activity and bear habitat intersect. These roles support early detection of conflict risk, attractant management, public education, and culturally grounded stewardship, helping to reduce the likelihood that encounters escalate into injuries or lethal outcomes. As human use of wild spaces continue to increase, proactive monitoring and community based stewardship will be essential components of effective bear conservation in British Columbia.
~ Expanded Conflict Context: Worker, Recreation, and Hunting-Related Encounters (2023-2025) ~
Although severe bear attacks remain statistically uncommon relative to the number of encounters across Western Canada, several high profile incidents between 2023 and 2025 demonstrate how risk increases where humans and bears overlap during periods of heightened bear activity (e.g,. Late summer and fall hyperphasia), in remote work settings, and during hunting seasons.
In Banff National Park (Alberta), two backcountry hikers and their dog were killed by a grizzly bear during an overnight camping trip in 2023. Reporting indicated the pair were on a permitted trip and had bear spray available, underscoring that even well prepared backcountry users can face rare, catastrophic outcomes in remote bear habitat. While this incident occurred outside British Columbia, it remains relevant to B.C conservation discussions because it illustrates the consequences of shared landscapes in protected areas managed for both recreation and wildlife conservation.
Workplace exposure also remains a consistent theme in bear safety and conservation. In 2023, a tree planter in Northeastern British Columbia was attacked by a grizzly bear sow, an event widely reported as defensive encounter in remote field conditions. In July 2025, a BC Wildfire Service firefighter working near Fort Nelson / Summit lake was attacked by a grizzly bear while on duty, with Conservation Officer Services reporting describing the incident as defensive in nature. These incidents highlight that remote workers operating in dense over, backcountry operational environments, or transitional habitats are exposed to encounter risk even when the objective is not recreation or wildlife viewing.
In 2025, several hunting related bear incidents also drew attention in Alberta and British Columbia. For example, reporting on a 2025 hunter malign south of Cochrane, Alberta emphasized the need to treat areas near communities as “bear country” when grizzlies are present and active during shoulder seasons. Beyond the immediate injuries, these stories often catalyst public debate about lethal responses, predator control, and the role of hunting in safety narratives, issues that intersect directly with bear conservation policy.
~ Hunting Season risk factors: calls, carcasses, scavenging behaviour ~
A key conservation relevant point is that hunters may unintentionally increase encounter risk through behaviours that reduce human “detect ability” while increasing bear interest. Alberta’s public guidance notes that hunting in bear territory can elevate risk because hunters are often quiet, may travel alone, and may use animal calls or attractants in pursuit of desired game species, all factors that increase the chance of a close encounter.
Additionally, carcasses and gut piles can attract bears and prompt scavenging behaviour, especially during pre-denning feeding periods. Safety guidance for hunters explicitly warns that gut piles/carcasses may draw bears and that hunters should prioritize safety over attempting to occupy a hunting site. Media reporting on a 2025 hunting incident in B.C further suggested that elk calling may have drawn a grizzly family group toward a hunter, an example of how wildlife vocalization used to call game can carry through habitat and potentially influence bear movement and conflict.
~ Firearms: defensive predator control vs. subsistence harvest ~
To avoid conflating very different uses of firearms in public discourse, it is important to distinguish defensive firearm use for predator control/self defence from firearms used in subsistence harvesting. Defensive use is situational, typically occurring during an immediate threat even where the goal is to stop an attack or prevent severe injury. Subsistence harvesting, by contrast, is purpose driven and planned, tied to food security, cultural practices and lawful harvest frameworks. In conservation writing, keeping this categories distinct helps prevent the mistaken assumption that expanding lethal responses necessarily improves public safety or reduces conflict at a population level, especially when many conflicts originate from attractants, habituation, and habitat overlap rather than predation.
~ Towards a Pro-active Solution: Wildlife Monitors & Land Guardians ~
While recent data and media coverage highlights rising bear moralities and escalating human-bear conflict across British Columbia, they also underscore a critical opportunity: most conflicts are preventable. Reactive, enforcement based responses often resulting in lethal outcomes address symptoms rather than root causes. Long term success in bear conservation depends on early intervention, community presence and stewardship driven approaches, that can be provided by a qualified Wildlife Monitor.
One of the most promising proactive solutions is the expansion of Wildlife Monitors and Indigenous Land Guardians as a permanent, boots on the ground presence in high conflict landscapes. Wildlife Monitors and Land Guardians serve as an essential bridge between communities, wildlife, and land managers by focusing on prevention rather than response. Their roles include early detection of wildlife & attractants, public outreach, monitoring bear & wildlife behaviour, hazing and implementing non-lethal deterrents, supporting coexistence practices, and providing culturally grounded stewardship informed by conservation and Indigenous knowledge systems.
Unlike reactive enforcement models, Wildlife Monitors and Land Guardians operate within the landscape daily identifying emerging risks before bears become habituated or food conditioned. Their presence promotes shared responsibility, reinforces wildlife values, and builds trust between communities, Indigenous Nations, and conservation authorities. In doing so, these programs not only reduce bear mortalities but also strengthen public understanding of bears & other wildlife as ecological and cultural keystones species rather than threats to be eliminated.
As pressure from climate change, habitat fragmentation, and human expansion continue to intensify, integrating Wildlife Monitors and Land Guardians into British Columbia’s bear conservation strategy represents a critical shift toward coexistence, accountability, and long term ecological resilience. Protecting bears requires protecting the systems and the people responsible for living alongside bears & other wildlife.
~ Conclusion ~
Bear Conservation challenges in British Columbia and Canada are increasingly shaped by human behaviour, land use decisions, and expanding use of wild spaces rather than by bear population growth alone. As climate change, habitat fragmentation, and recreation pressure continue to intensify, human / bear conflict is likely to increase unless preventative, landscape level approaches are implemented.
Recent trends demonstrate that reactive enforcement models often resulting in lethal outcomes, address conflict only after bears and other wildlife have become habituated or food conditioned. In contrast, proactive strategies centered on attractant management, education, conservation, indigenous stewardship, and early intervention off a more effective and socially supported path forward.
The integration of Wildlife Monitors & Indigenous Land Guardians represents a critical evolution in bear conservation and public safety. These programs provide a consistent, boots on the ground presence capable of identifying risks early, education land users through outreach programs and supporting hazing methods & non-lethal deterrence, and reinforcing cultural and ecological values. As British Columbia moves toward coexistence with recovering wildlife populations in increasing shared landscapes, investment in proactive stewardship and conservation Weill be essential to reducing conflict while preserving bears as ecological and cultural keystone species.
~ References ~
(British Columbia & Canada – Bear Conservation, Conflict and Stewardship)
CBC News. (2021). Bear encounters on the rise in B.C. due to food shortages caused by heat and wildfires. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-bear-encounters-climb-august-1.6157613
CBC News. (2023). Tree planter recovering after bear attack near Tumbler Ridge, B.C. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/treeplanter-bear-attack-tumbler-ridge-1.6899816
CBC News. (2024). Deadliest city for bears: Prince George killed record number of black bears in 2023. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/deadliest-city-bears-prince-george-1.7265548
CBC News. (2024). Bear killed in defence attack in Maple Ridge. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bear-attack-man-dog-maple-ridge-1.7391944
CTV News. (2024). Black bear killed in self-defence after attack on dog walker in Maple Ridge, B.C.
https://bc.ctvnews.ca/black-bear-killed-in-self-defence-after-attack-on-dog-walker-in-maple-ridge-b-c-1.7121238
CTV News. (2025). Man recovering after defensive grizzly bear attack in northern B.C.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/man-recovering-after-defensive-grizzly-attack-in-northern-bc/
Globe and Mail. Hunter, J. (2024). After a record year for bear killings, B.C. conservation officers face calls for a gentler approach.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com
Globe and Mail. Cox, W., & Iype, M. (2024). B.C. conservation officers killed a record number of bears last year. Did they have to?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com
Global News. Judd, A., & Johnson, P. (2024). B.C. community outraged after bear killed with no oversight.
https://globalnews.ca
Government of British Columbia. (2023). B.C. looking for input on grizzly bear stewardship framework and commercial bear-viewing strategy.
https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2023FOR0043-001121
My Modern Met. Cole, M. (2024). Canadian conservation group buys out hunting rights for B.C. rainforest to protect Indigenous wildlife.
https://mymodernmet.com
The Narwhal. (2024). Recent grizzly attacks have B.C. and Alberta on edge, but experts say hunting bears is unlikely to help.
The Tyee. (2020). Organization aims to end trophy hunts by buying up guide-outfitter rights.
https://thetyee.ca
Yahoo News. Hall, T. (2024). Environmental group buying millions of dollars worth of commercial hunting permits in Canada.
https://www.yahoo.com
Vic News. (2019). B.C. Conservation Officer Service bear destruction statistics.
https://www.vicnews.com
• Canadian Press Staff. (2025, November 21). Grizzly attack on B.C. elementary class is latest in series of encounters. Canadian Press.
• The Guardian. (2025, November 21). Eleven injured after grizzly bear attacks schoolchildren and teachers in Canada.
• Winnipeg Free Press. (2025, September 30). Two charged in July death of grizzly bear on Texada Island in B.C.
• Texada Island. (2025). Wikipedia.
Alberta Government. (n.d.). Bears and hunters.
Alberta.ca
Alberta Parks. (2025). Visiting bear country.
Alberta Parks
BearWise. (n.d.). Hunting safety: Carcasses and bears.
BearWise
CBC News. (2023). Tree planter bear attack near Tumbler Ridge, B.C.
CochraneNow
Conservation Officer Service (B.C.). (2025). Defensive grizzly bear attack in northern B.C. (public notice).
Facebook
Energetic City. (2025, July 10). Man attacked by grizzly bear was Summit Lake firefighter.
Energeticcity.ca
Global News. (2025, July 6). Man recovering after “defensive” grizzly bear attack in northern B.C.
Global News
Reuters. (2023, October 3). Canada grizzly bear attack victims were on permitted hike, carrying bear spray.
Reuters
The Guardian. (2023, October 5). ‘Bear attack bad’: final message of Canadian couple killed by grizzly.
The Guardian
Global News / Canadian Press. (2023, October 4). “Bear attack bad”: Harrowing final message from Alberta couple killed by grizzly.
Global News
CityNews Calgary. (2025, November 1). Bear attack prompts declaration of Calgary part of ‘bear country’: specialist.
CityNews Calgary
People. (2025). Hunter airlifted to hospital after being mauled by a grizzly bear while hunting.
People.com
Meateater. (2025, October 8). Elk hunter attacked by grizzly; officials believe calling attracted bear.
MeatEater
Yahoo News. (2025, November 2). Officials issue warning after hunter attacked; calls believed to have attracted bear.
Yahoo
Parks Canada. (2024–2025). Bear attractants / safe travel in bear country (mountain national parks).
